By Issac V. Samson
The Oriental Orthodox Churches are distinguished by their recognition of only the first three ecumenical councils, including: 1) the first council of Nicea in AD 325, 2) the Council of Constantinople in AD 381, and Council of Ephesus in AD 431. Out of these councils, the Council of Ephesus became the foundation of our Christological definition. When we discuss about Council of Ephesus, two episcopal center’s stand out: Alexandria and Constantinople led by Saint Cyril of Alexandria and Nestorius. This article is divided into five parts: A) Background, B) Events that led to the Council of Ephesus, C) the position of Nestorius, D) Events during the Council of Ephesus, and E) Observations. Let’s start with the background of Council of Ephesus through various events that happened in Alexandrian and Constantinople Churches just before the Council.
A) BACKGROUND: 1) Church of
Alexandria:
- After the first two ecumenical councils, the Alexandrian
Church was soon known as a leading force in Theology. Its theological teachings
and research were one of the best in the Christian world. From the 1st Century,
Alexandrian Christian theologians were the best in the world, including:
Clement, Origen and Athanasius. During this time, the centers of Rome and
Alexandria were undisputed leaders of the Christian world in all aspects.
- Towards the end of the third century, many pagan temples
of Alexandria were converted into Churches by Saint Theophilus (Archbishop of
Alexandria). This was a major step in bringing Christianity to the mainstream
in Alexandria. It was during this supremacy of the Alexandrian Church that
Saint Cyril was born in AD 378. He was the nephew of Saint Theophilus. He was a
very keen reader of all the works of great Alexandrian theologians, especially
the works of Saint Athanasius. He started the practice of referencing the
writings of great theologians in his own work. He was very close to his uncle,
Saint Theophilus and this relationship helped him attain more wisdom and
knowledge.
- When Saint Theophilus died in AD 412, Saint Cyril became
the frontrunner to succeed him as the Bishop of Alexandria. However, in this
situation, Saint Cyril had to face the first test of his ministerial and administrative
career. The Byzantine administration tried to block Saint Cyril and supported
Archdeacon Timothy. However, with the support of the local people, Saint Cyril
succeeded Saint Theophilus as the Bishop of Alexandria.
- In the early years of his administration, Saint Cyril would
be characterized as reformer. He tried to take the people of Alexandria away
from pagan influence. However, he had to face a lot of trials in his initial
years as a Bishop. There were growing tensions between Christians and Jews in
Alexandria. Jews began to destroy churches intentionally. After these incidents,
Saint Cyril led a delegation to the Jewish authorities to demand peace and
justice in the Alexandrian society.
The relationship of Saint Cyril with “Orestes”(the Byzantine Governor) started to decline significantly. This was mainly due to the growing popularity of Saint Cyril, which in turn made Orestes dislike him. A Christian mob attacked Jewish synagogues and killed a Pagan woman by dragging her to a church and stoning her to death. This was one of those acts which Saint Cyril vocally opposed. It brought shame to the entire Christian Community of Alexandria. The Byzantine administration directed the blame of this entire event towards Saint Cyril. After this event and the court verdict, it was announced that St. Cyril would be held accountable for the actions of the mob and that his own number of Episcopal bodyguards were to be reduced. However, this court decision was later reversed by the same court, including all the penalties against this saint.
The relationship of Saint Cyril with “Orestes”(the Byzantine Governor) started to decline significantly. This was mainly due to the growing popularity of Saint Cyril, which in turn made Orestes dislike him. A Christian mob attacked Jewish synagogues and killed a Pagan woman by dragging her to a church and stoning her to death. This was one of those acts which Saint Cyril vocally opposed. It brought shame to the entire Christian Community of Alexandria. The Byzantine administration directed the blame of this entire event towards Saint Cyril. After this event and the court verdict, it was announced that St. Cyril would be held accountable for the actions of the mob and that his own number of Episcopal bodyguards were to be reduced. However, this court decision was later reversed by the same court, including all the penalties against this saint.
- This represents the remarkable ability of Saint Cyril to
bounce back from political adversities. The period from 412 to 418 AD was
problematic for Saint Cyril. However, the next few years were peaceful and it
helped him stabilize the administration and provide good leadership over the
monasteries of Alexandria, making him more popular in Alexandrian Church.
During this time, he also wrote many theological books but those works are
overshadowed by his later works.
2) Church of Constantinople:
A new Archbishop “Nestorius” was appointed in the Church of
Constantinople after the death of Archbishop Sisinnius. He was a Syrian Monk recommended by the newly
appointed Archbishop John of the Antiochian Church. Similar to Saint Cyril,
Nestorius tried to be a “Reformer” in his early period as an Archbishop.
- Nestorius persuaded the Emperor of Constantinople to
restrict the races in Circus and the number of dancing girls performing there.
At that time, this was a passion for the people of Constantinople and
restricting it earned a lot of criticism and hate towards Nestorius.
- Many monks of the Constantinople Church lived in cities
and were imperial officers at that time. This system was not considered as good
by Nestorius. He made it clear that monastic community had to vocally oppose this
system in their own local churches as a matter of church leadership and civic responsibility.
Thus, he earned the criticism of many monks across the Constantinople Church.
He forcefully closed the last Arian chapel of Constantinople. This also led to
many protests against him. This was the background of Constantinople church
before the Council of Ephesus.
B) Events that led
to Council of Ephesus:
- Soon after
Nestorius became archbishop, after all his administrative reforms, he started
to teach a different theology that was not existing at that point of time. He was supported by a group of Syrian
theologians who were spreading the teachings of “Diodore” to the Monks of
Constantinople.
- Nestorius started to teach that
Saint Mary is not the mother of God. Nestorius believed that St. Mary gave
birth to a mere human and that Divinity descended and filled this human later
on; Thus the Virgin Mary would be called the "Mother of Jesus Christ"
(Christotokos), and not the "Mother of God" (Theotokos).In doing so, Nestorius
is considered to have denied the Divinity of Christ. His theory that Divinity
descended and filled Our Lord meant that there was no Hypostatic union".
This type of teachings were rejected by the monks of the Constantinople Church.
People considered this as an assault to the image of Saint Mary. In AD 429, signs
and placards appeared in the city stating that Nestorius was “heretic”.
- In order to regain support from
the people, Nestorius later took a U-turn in his teaching and preached that
“Saint Mary can be called Mother of God”. However, after sometime he once again
tried hard to spread his original Christotokos-based teachings on Saint Mary.
- This news reached Saint Cyril
of Alexandria and he was quick to write a letter to `Nestorius urging him to
correct his Theology. Nestorius replied to that letter by threatening him that
he will be summoned at the Church of Constantinople. Nestorius expressed that the
“United Nature” theology of Saint Cyril, was the worst theology. A series of
letters were exchanged between Saint Cyril and Nestorius which would ultimately
serve as evidence at Council of Ephesus.
- Nestorius was concerned that
Saint Cyril was trying to destroy the peace of the Constantinople Church and the
use of theology was just a means to this end. However, Saint Cyril was only
concerned about truth in theology.
- After all these events,
Nestorius knew that these issues could only be resolved through an Ecumenical
Council, where he thought he would gather the support he needed and continue to
spread his own teachings. Nestorius made
this suggestion to the Emperor to assemble an Ecumenical Council.
C) Position of
Nestorius:
- Nestorius was confident that he would get sufficient support for
his own theological teachings at the Council, and therefore wanted to conduct
this council as soon as possible. However, almost all the odds were stacked
against him.
- In his own Church, most of the
monks were against Nestorius due to his policy against them being monks and
imperial officers at the same time (as mentioned earlier). Secondly, the people
of Constantinople were against him due to his vocal restrictions in Circus. Thus,
he literally had no support in his own Church.
- One of the most significant
mistakes of Nestorius would be in alienating “Augusta Pulcheria”, the sister of
Emperor. Due to his teaching, he faced a lot of criticism from the public. His
arrogant letters to Saint Cyril also worked against him. He had no support from
his own people, his own monks, and even his fellow bishops. What made matters
worse would be the response from the Church of Rome.
- The biggest mistake of
Nestorius was in welcoming a group of Bishops, who were previously excommunicated
by the Church of Rome. He tried to settle their issues with Rome – A step which
was not liked by Church of Rome. Pope Celestine received letters related to the
teaching of Nestorius. After a detailed analysis, Pope Celestine got negative
reviews about these teachings. A synod was called in Rome which found Nestorius
guilty of Heresy. All of these events transpired before the Council of Ephesus.
Now, the official stand of the Alexandrian and the Roman churches (Two of most
powerful churches of that time) were against Nestorius.
- The only support that Nestorius
had was from Church of Antioch as he had good relationship with Archbishop John
of Antioch. Soon the decision to convey a Council at Ephesus was taken by
Emperor Theodosius II of Constantinople.
D) Events during
Council of Ephesus:
- Saint Cyril reached Ephesus in advance and was welcomed by Bishop
Memnon. The Roman representatives and the delegation led by Archbishop John of
Antioch (a group that supported Nestorius) were delayed by a lot of days. After
waiting for few days, Saint Cyril decided that he cannot wait anymore. Saint
Cyril began to suspect that Archbishop John of Antioch was deliberately delaying
his arrive to avoid the trial of his friend Nestorius. The opponents of Saint
Cyril, however, thought that St. Cyril was trying to sway the Council and complete
the trial by Council before the arrival of Archbishop John of Antioch.
- On Sunday June 21,431 AD, Saint
Cyril with the support of over 200 bishops, decided to start the Council of
Ephesus. Saint Cyril presided over the council with the letter from the Pope of
Rome and with the support of Senior Bishops. When the proceedings started,
Nestorius refused to answer any questions directed at him. All the letters
between Saint Cyril and Nestorius were read out loud. The letters of Nestorius
were condemned and letters of Saint Cyril were accepted as the true Orthodox
Doctrine. At the conclusion of this day
and the council meeting, a huge crowd gathered around church of Saint Mary with
torches lit with the onset of night, to hear the outcome of synod. When it was
declared that Nestorius was excommunicated, it was popularly interpreted as
victory for the mother of God. There was no greater joy in the city than this
verdict by the Council.
- After a few days, the Syrian
delegation from Antioch arrived at Ephesus and were furious to know that synod
was already held without their attendance. A counter-synod was presided by Archbishop
John of Antioch, which deposed Saint Cyril and suspended him until he returns to
face a combined synod. Both parties appealed to the Emperor and he ordered that
no Bishops were to leave Ephesus until the issue was resolved. The Emperor send
out a delegation to investigate the matter. After the investigation, the Emperor
made a strange decision of deposing Nestorius, Saint Cyril and Memnon. Archbishop
John of Antioch accepted this decision but the two hundred bishops supporting
Saint Cyril would not abandon St Cyril.
- Public protests were held
against the deposition of Saint Cyril. There was a major riot where the
cathedral was occupied by protesters. Saint Cyril was also supported by
monastic bishops. Emperor Theodosius was surprised to see the support for Saint
Cyril and asked both parties to debate in front of him. After hearing both the
parties for weeks, he decided to depose Nestorius and condemned him for heresy.
He agreed to the majority decision of the Council and agreed the theological
doctrine of Saint Cyril.
- Saint Cyril would return to
Alexandria victorious and having been instrumental in resolving the biggest
crisis of the Christian world at that time.
E) Observations:
- As mentioned in the background (Part A), there were a lot of
similarities between these two church fathers Saint Cyril and Bishop Nestorius.
Both Saint Cyril and Nestorius were “Reformers” during their initial years as
Archbishop in their respective centers. However, Nestorius lost the plot when
he started to spread his teaching which claimed that Saint Mary is not the
mother of God. This resulted in a huge uproar from the Public.
- When we study the letters
exchanged between Saint Cyril and Nestorius, we can see that Saint Cyril was
always calm. He had the grace of Holy Spirit with him. On the other hand,
Nestorius was harsh and arrogant with his replies to other clergy and church
fathers. Bishop Nestorius was trying to force his teaching onto everyone. I
personally believe that Nestorius lost the Council of Ephesus well before it
actually began.
- We have to applaud the methodical
plan of Saint Cyril, which was inspired by God. When the news of this Nestorian
heresy reached him, he was calm. He wrote to the Pope of Rome and gathered his
support. He studied the issues and continuously prayed. He wrote letters to
Nestorius and destroyed the heretical teachings one by one. He reached the
Council of Ephesus in advance. He had resounding support from his own church
and his maturity could be seen in his letters.
- Saint Cyril had the remarkable
ability to bounce back from political diversities. God always protected him and
this was seen in his entire life. The way he handled the issues with Byzantine
Governor and then with Emperor Theodosius highlights his ability to bounce back
from issues.
The Council of Ephesus is one of
the most important ecumenical councils of Christian History. This Article is a
humble effort to show the background of the council along with events of the
Council of Ephesus.
Reference:
1)
1-65 page
of “On the Unity of Chirst” written by Saint Cyril of Alexandria.
2)
Letters of
Saint Cyril of Alexandria.
Hey nice article. It's very well explained π
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot!!
DeleteBrilliant. You seem to have done a lot of research
ReplyDeleteAll by his grace!! Thanks
DeleteNice article!
ReplyDeleteThanks π
DeleteGood going. Keep it up
ReplyDeleteThanks
DeleteGood workπππ
ReplyDeleteGreat effort π€©π€©ππ
Keep going π
Lot of hard work put in.... appreciate your effort
ReplyDeleteThanks alot bhaiya
DeleteGreat .. Keep writing :)
ReplyDeleteWell written and explained.
ReplyDeleteGreat work
ReplyDeleteVery good effort .ur curiosity to understand the early fathers effort to keep the orthodox faith is really appreasiable .ur interst of research should continue..great attempt ..congratulations ..loving isac achen
ReplyDeleteThanks alot Isaac achen. Your blessings are indeed a source of motivation for me ☺️
DeleteCommendable, Issac. Appreciate your efforts. By grasping the background, proceedings and outcome of the third ecumenical council with your thorough researches, you present it beautifully with your own comments for modern readers. By focusing on specific insights from the History of Christianity and Patristics you will be able to write many edifying articles. All the best for your creative contributions.
ReplyDeleteFr. Bijesh Philip
Thanks alot Bijesh Acha. I am indeed blessed to receive such an appreciation from a learned and scholar priest like you acha. Please remember me in your prayers and continue to bless me π
DeleteBrilliant work bro!!
ReplyDeleteThanks bro !
DeleteA very good and commentable researched work with lots of detailed description regarding the background and even the observations made by you. Great work
ReplyDeleteKeep up the efforts!!!